From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Buster

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 21, 1992
608 A.2d 692 (Conn. 1992)

Opinion

Michael A. Fitzpatrick, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Richard F. Jacobson, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Decided May 21, 1992


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 263, is granted, limited to the following questions:

"1. Was the Appellate Court correct in holding that the trial court properly admitted into evidence certain remarks attributed to a nonparty witness contained in the written statement of another witness, pursuant to State v. Whelan, 200 Conn. 743, 514 A.2d 86, cert. denied, 479 U.S. 994, 107 S.Ct. 597, 93 L.Ed.2d 598 (1986)?

"2. If the ruling was erroneous, was it harmful?"


Summaries of

State v. Buster

Supreme Court of Connecticut
May 21, 1992
608 A.2d 692 (Conn. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Buster

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DOUGLAS W. BUSTER

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: May 21, 1992

Citations

608 A.2d 692 (Conn. 1992)
608 A.2d 692

Citing Cases

State v. Buster

" and (2) "If the ruling was erroneous, was it harmful?" State v. Buster, 222 Conn. 909-10, 608 A.2d 692…