From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Burnette

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 22, 2017
NO. 35,739 (N.M. Ct. App. Feb. 22, 2017)

Opinion

NO. 35,739

02-22-2017

STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNIE BURNETTE, Defendant-Appellant.

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Santa Fe, NM Jane A. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender Will O'Connell Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Appellant


This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF DONA ANA COUNTY
Marci Beyer, District Judge Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM
Jane A. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General
Albuquerque, NM for Appellee Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender
Will O'Connell
Assistant Appellate Defender
Santa Fe, NM for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VANZI, Chief Judge. {1} Following a guilty plea to aggravated driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs (DWI), contrary to NMSA 1978, § 66-8-102(D)(1) (2016), and driving the wrong way (one-way roadway), contrary to NMSA 1978, § 66-7-316 (2003), [DS 2; RP 56] Defendant appealed from the judgment and sentence, arguing that one of the prior DWIs used for enhancement to a fourth DWI was invalid because the State did not establish that he was represented by counsel. We issued a first notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to affirm. In response, Defendant filed a memorandum in opposition. Upon consideration of Defendant's arguments, we issued a second notice of proposed summary disposition proposing to reverse. The State has filed a timely response indicating that it will not be filing a memorandum in opposition. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in our second notice of proposed summary disposition, we reverse.

{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ _________

LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

/s/ _________
JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge /s/ _________
M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge


Summaries of

State v. Burnette

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Feb 22, 2017
NO. 35,739 (N.M. Ct. App. Feb. 22, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Burnette

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHNIE BURNETTE…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Feb 22, 2017

Citations

NO. 35,739 (N.M. Ct. App. Feb. 22, 2017)