From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Buchanan

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Aug 27, 2012
File No.: 0801031784 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 27, 2012)

Opinion

File No.: 0801031784

08-27-2012

State of Delaware v. David J. Buchanan



JUDGE

SUSSEX COUNTY COURTHOUSE

N440
David J. Buchanan
SBI # 002
Sussex Correctional Institution
P.O. Box 500
Georgetown, DE 19947
Dear Mr. Buchanan:

This letter addresses your motion to proceed in forma pauperis on a petition for a writ of certiorari.

Your in forma pauperis motion is dismissed. You have not provided a certified summary of your inmate account or the accompanying affidavit. Title 10 Del.C. §8802(b) and §8804(a). As shown in your motion, you are aware of the procedural requirements for bringing court actions without paying costs, but have chosen to ignore them. Your motion is both factually and legally frivolous, wasting judicial resources.

Your proposed writ of certiorari raises issues related to the GPS device that was installed in your vehicle by order of this Court. This issue has been thoroughly explored and decided against you, and you offer nothing to change that outcome. Certiorari review is unavailable because there are no irregularities on the face of the record. American Funding Services v. State, 41 A.3d 711, 714 (Del.2012).

You also allege errors in the Family Court proceedings regarding property division and the PFA order prohibiting you from entering your marital dwelling. These issues have also been explored and resolved against you. There are no errors on the face of the record for certiorari review.

If a litigant seeking to proceed in court without paying costs files a frivolous or malicious complaint, he may be enjoined from filing future claims without leave of court. 10 Del.C. § 8803. I find that your complaint for certiorari review is both legally and factually frivolous. Any further claims you file must be accompanied by an affidavit that meets the five statutory requirements. 10 Del.C. § 8803(e).

Your motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DISMISSED.

YOU ARE ENJOINED FROM FILING FURTHER SUCH MOTIONS EXCEPT BY LEAVE OF COURT AS SET FORTH IN 10 DEL.C. § 8803(e).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Very truly yours,

Richard F. Stokes cc: Prothonotary

Department of Justice


Summaries of

State v. Buchanan

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Aug 27, 2012
File No.: 0801031784 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 27, 2012)
Case details for

State v. Buchanan

Case Details

Full title:State of Delaware v. David J. Buchanan

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Aug 27, 2012

Citations

File No.: 0801031784 (Del. Super. Ct. Aug. 27, 2012)

Citing Cases

Kile v. State

Id. Cf. State v. Buchanan, 2012 WL 4150060, at *1 (Del. Super. Aug. 27, 2012); State v. James, 2002 WL…

Delgrosso v. United States

The account summary appears to be a printed copy obtained through an online inmate inquiry. Cf. State v.…