Opinion
No. 2001-0253.
October 27, 2004.
Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-393-660.
On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Motion denied because the appellant failed to comply with the 90-day filing deadline in S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6)(A).
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
State v. Bryan
Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 27, 2004
103 Ohio St. 3d 1490 (Ohio 2004)
Summaries of
State v. Bryan
Supreme Court of Ohio
Oct 27, 2004
103 Ohio St. 3d 1490 (Ohio 2004)
denying reopening as untimely
Summary of this case from Bryan v. BobbyCase details for
State v. Bryan
Case Details
Full title:State v. Bryan
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Oct 27, 2004
Citations
103 Ohio St. 3d 1490 (Ohio 2004)
2004 Ohio 5605
Citing Cases
Bryan v. Bobby
The trial court sentenced Bryan to death and 33 1/2 years.Bryan unsuccessfully sought relief on direct…
Ahmed v. HoukThis Court finds only two capital cases in which the Ohio Supreme Court enforced the timeliness requirement…