From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Nov 1, 2017
91 N.E.3d 739 (Ohio 2017)

Opinion

No. 2016–1652

11-01-2017

The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. BROWN, Appellant.

Michael DeWine, Attorney General, Eric E. Murphy, State Solicitor, and Michael J. Hendershot, Chief Deputy Solicitor; and Gary D. Bishop, Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jodie M. Schumacher, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Stephen P. Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.


Michael DeWine, Attorney General, Eric E. Murphy, State Solicitor, and Michael J. Hendershot, Chief Deputy Solicitor; and Gary D. Bishop, Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Jodie M. Schumacher, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Stephen P. Hardwick, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

{¶ 1} The certification of conflict is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified.

O'Connor, C.J., and O'Donnell, Kennedy, French, O'Neill, Fischer, and DeWine, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of Ohio.
Nov 1, 2017
91 N.E.3d 739 (Ohio 2017)
Case details for

State v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:The STATE of Ohio, Appellee, v. BROWN, Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio.

Date published: Nov 1, 2017

Citations

91 N.E.3d 739 (Ohio 2017)
91 N.E.3d 739
2017 Ohio 8370

Citing Cases

State v. Cupp

And our precedent reveals that we are able to decide not to exercise our jurisdiction after certification of…