From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1955
89 S.E.2d 157 (N.C. 1955)

Opinion

Filed 21 September, 1955.

Appeal and Error 38 — Where the Supreme Court is evenly divided in opinion, the judgment of the lower court will be affirmed without becoming a precedent.

APPEAL by defendant from Nettles, J., February Term, 1955, of BUNCOMBE.

Attorney-General Rodman and Assistant Attorney-General Love for the State.

W. W. Candler and Cecil C. Jackson for defendant, appellant.


Upon indictment and trial by jury, defendant was found guilty of larceny as charged. From judgment pronounced, imposing a prison sentence, defendant appealed.


It is the unanimous opinion of this Court that defendant's motion for nonsuit was properly overruled.

Two members of the Court, Winborne and Higgins, JJ., not sitting, but with Devin, Emergency Justice, participating in lieu of Winborne, J., and the six sitting members being equally divided in opinion as to whether prejudicial error in the conduct of the trial has been shown, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, without becoming a precedent. Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Sep 1, 1955
89 S.E.2d 157 (N.C. 1955)
Case details for

State v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. SAMUEL J. BROWN

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Sep 1, 1955

Citations

89 S.E.2d 157 (N.C. 1955)
89 S.E.2d 157

Citing Cases

State v. Woodruff

The decision of the Davidson County Superior Court is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value.…

State v. Smith

Cole v. R. R., 211 N.C. 591, 191 S.E. 353; Allen v. Ins. Co., 211 N.C. 736, 190 S.E. 735, and cases cited.…