From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brown

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 20, 1993
869 P.2d 904 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

10-91-09590; CA A73889

On respondent's motion for reconsideration filed December 20, 1993, reconsideration allowed; opinion ( 119 Or. App. 162, 849 P.2d 547 (1993)) modified; convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing March 2, 1994

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lane County, F. Gordon Cottrell, Judge.

Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General, for motion.

Mary M. Reese, Deputy Public Defender, contra.

Before Richardson, Chief Judge, and Warren and Edmonds, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


The state moves for reconsideration of our decision. State v. Brown, 119 Or. App. 162, 849 P.2d 547 (1993). We grant the motion and modify the opinion.

In our decision, we remanded for resentencing only on particular counts of the indictment and otherwise affirmed. Under the 1993 version of ORS 138.222(5), Or Laws 1993, ch 692, § 2, we must remand the entire case for resentencing. State v. Dvorak, 124 Or. App. 578, 863 P.2d 1314 (1993), rev den 318 Or. 351 (1994).

Reconsideration allowed; opinion modified; convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

State v. Brown

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 20, 1993
869 P.2d 904 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

State v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DAVID EDWIN BROWN, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 20, 1993

Citations

869 P.2d 904 (Or. Ct. App. 1993)
869 P.2d 904

Citing Cases

State v. Hagan

We conclude that in this case, remand for resentencing is required. ORS 138.222(5); State v. Brown, 119 Or.…