From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Idaho
Sep 1, 2021
No. 48098 (Idaho Ct. App. Sep. 1, 2021)

Opinion

48098 48099

09-01-2021

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERICK BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jacob L. Westerfield, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Jonathan Medema, District Judge.

Judgments of conviction and consecutive, unified sentences of ten years with five years determinate for felony injury to children and five years indeterminate for felony injury to children, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jacob L. Westerfield, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

Before HUSKEY, Chief Judge; LORELLO, Judge; and BRAILSFORD, Judge

PER CURIAM

In cases consolidated for appeal, Erick Brown entered an Alford plea in Docket No. 48098 to felony injury to children, Idaho Code § 18-1501(1). The district court imposed a unified sentence of ten years with five years determinate and gave Brown credit for time served. In Docket No. 48099, Brown pled guilty to felony injury to children, I.C. § 18-1501, and the district court imposed five years indeterminate to run consecutive to Brown's sentence in Docket No. 48098. Brown appeals, contending that his sentences are excessive.

See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970).

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Our role is limited to determining whether reasonable minds could reach the same conclusion as the district court. State v. Biggs, 168 Idaho 112, 116, 480 P.3d 150, 154 (Ct. App. 2020).

Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Brown's judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Idaho
Sep 1, 2021
No. 48098 (Idaho Ct. App. Sep. 1, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ERICK BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Idaho

Date published: Sep 1, 2021

Citations

No. 48098 (Idaho Ct. App. Sep. 1, 2021)