From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brown

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 12, 2020
2020 N.D. 29 (N.D. 2020)

Opinion

No. 20190206

02-12-2020

State of North Dakota Plaintiff and Appellee v. Orlando Joseph Brown, Defendant and Appellant

Sarah W. Gereszek, Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.


Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Sarah W. Gereszek, Assistant State's Attorney, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee. Benjamin C. Pulkrabek, Mandan, ND, for defendant and appellant.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Orlando Joseph Brown appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of aggravated assault and two counts of gross sexual imposition. Brown argues the district court erred by issuing a pre-trial order allowing the State to introduce at trial evidence of past incidents of domestic violence that occurred between Brown and the victim within the three week period prior to the incident that led to the above stated charges. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing a pre-trial order permitting the State to introduce this prior-act evidence under N.D.R.Ev. 404(b). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

State v. Brown

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Feb 12, 2020
2020 N.D. 29 (N.D. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:State of North Dakota Plaintiff and Appellee v. Orlando Joseph Brown…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Feb 12, 2020

Citations

2020 N.D. 29 (N.D. 2020)

Citing Cases

Brown v. State

On direct appeal, Brown argued the district court abused its discretion by allowing the State to introduce…