From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Broomfield

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 10, 1978
354 So. 2d 1361 (La. 1978)

Opinion

No. 60823.

February 10, 1978.

APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ORLEANS; FRANK A. MARULLO, JR., JUDGE.

William J. O'Hara, III Supervising Atty., New Orleans, Edwin G. Foulke, Jr., Student Practitioner, Loyola Law School Clinic, for defendant-appellant.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Barbara Rutledge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Harry F. Connick, Dist. Atty., Philip J. Boudousque, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.


Affirmed.

DENNIS, J., concurs for the reasons assigned in the separate opinions in State v. Terrebonne, No. 60,731 La., 354 So.2d 1356.

TATE, J., concurs. The substantial issue of constitutionality does not appear to be squarely raised by trial court motion or objection or by assignment of error.


Summaries of

State v. Broomfield

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 10, 1978
354 So. 2d 1361 (La. 1978)
Case details for

State v. Broomfield

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. HAROLD BROOMFIELD

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 10, 1978

Citations

354 So. 2d 1361 (La. 1978)