From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Briskey

Court of Appeals of Washington
Nov 23, 2015
71252-7-I (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2015)

Opinion

71252-7-I

11-23-2015

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. KURTIS W. BRISKEY, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Leach, J.

Kurtis Briskey appeals an order denying his motion to seal records of his juvenile court guilty pleas to two counts of first degree malicious mischief. He challenges the trial court's ruling that the records cannot be sealed until his restitution obligation, which is no longer enforceable as a money judgment, has been paid in full. We rejected his argument recently in State v. Hamedian, 188 Wn.App. 560, 354 P.3d 937 (2015) (payment of restitution is a condition precedent to obtaining an order to seal juvenile offender records).

Affirmed.

WE CONCUR: Cox, J.


Summaries of

State v. Briskey

Court of Appeals of Washington
Nov 23, 2015
71252-7-I (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2015)
Case details for

State v. Briskey

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. KURTIS W. BRISKEY, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of Washington

Date published: Nov 23, 2015

Citations

71252-7-I (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 23, 2015)