State v. Bright

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Roy G. Bright, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 18, 2012

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-426 (S.C. Ct. App. Jul. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-426

07-18-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Roy G. Bright, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD

NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY

PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

J. Derham Cole, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Barry J. Barnette, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Roy G. Bright appeals his conviction of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, arguing the circuit court erred in failing to hold an in camera hearing to determine if a photographic line-up should be suppressed. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.