From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Braxton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 31, 2018
2018-UP-400 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-400

10-31-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Daniel Caleb Braxton, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2016-002341

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted October 1, 2018

Appeal From Orangeburg County Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

KONDUROS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Braxton

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Oct 31, 2018
2018-UP-400 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Braxton

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Daniel Caleb Braxton, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 31, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-400 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2018)