From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brantley

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 6, 2022
No. 2022-UP-164 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2022-UP-164 Appellate Case 2020-001713

04-06-2022

The State, Respondent, v. Ramesha Monet Brantley, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted March 1, 2022

Appeal From Lancaster County Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Brantley

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 6, 2022
No. 2022-UP-164 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 6, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Brantley

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Ramesha Monet Brantley, Appellant.

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 6, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-UP-164 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 6, 2022)