From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brandfon

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 7, 1956
40 N.J. Super. 328 (App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

Submitted June 4, 1956 —

Decided June 7, 1956.

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

Mr. Jerome Brandfon, appellant, pro se Mr. Frederick T. Law, Hudson County Prosecutor, for the respondent ( Mr. Frank J.V. Gimino, Assistant County Prosecutor).


The order of the Hudson County Court here reviewed, which denied the defendant's motion for credit for time previously spent in confinement in serving a sentence imposed on him in another jurisdiction, is affirmed for the reasons expressed by Judge Coolahan in his opinion reported in 38 N.J. Super. 412 ( Cty. Ct. 1955).


Summaries of

State v. Brandfon

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Jun 7, 1956
40 N.J. Super. 328 (App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

State v. Brandfon

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JEROME BRANDFON, ALIAS…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Jun 7, 1956

Citations

40 N.J. Super. 328 (App. Div. 1956)
123 A.2d 30

Citing Cases

State v. Sinacore

State v. Council, 137 N.J. Super. 306 (App.Div. 1975). See also, State v. Brandfon, 38 N.J. Super. 412…

State v. Hill

" Although the rule "expresses the public policy of the State and should be liberally construed," State v.…