From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brady

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 9, 1994
640 N.E.2d 811 (Ohio 1994)

Opinion

No. 94-1206

Submitted August 17, 1994 —

Decided November 9, 1994.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 16329.

Appellant, Harold Brady II, alleges he was convicted of one count of felonious assault and one count of burglary. He appealed, and the court of appeals affirmed the conviction by judgment entry of January 12, 1994. Appellant's motion to certify the record to this court was overruled. State v. Brady (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 1430, 631 N.E.2d 641. He applied to the court of appeals to reopen the appeal from the judgment of conviction, alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. In May 1994, the court of appeals denied the application on the basis that appellant did not show that appellate counsel was ineffective. Appellant appeals the denial to this court.

Lynn C. Slaby, Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip D. Bogdanoff, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

Harold Brady, pro se.


The decision of the court of appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated by the court of appeals.

Judgment affirmed.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Brady

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 9, 1994
640 N.E.2d 811 (Ohio 1994)
Case details for

State v. Brady

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BRADY, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 9, 1994

Citations

640 N.E.2d 811 (Ohio 1994)
640 N.E.2d 811