From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 4, 1973
275 So. 2d 407 (La. 1973)

Opinion

No. 52801.

April 4, 1973.

Appeal from Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, Section "B", No. 216-739; Honorable Matthew S. Braniff, Judge.

Andrews, Barry DeSalvo, Dean A. Andrews, Jr., Michael F. Barry, Pres Kabacoff, M. Hampton Carver, New Orleans, for defendants-appellants.

William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., LeRoy A. Hartley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jim Garrison, Dist. Atty., Louise Korns, Asst. Dist. Atty., for plaintiff-appellee.


During the pendency of the appeal lodged in this Court, defendants re-urged their motion for a hearing on a new trial. This motion had been timely filed in the trial court based upon allegations of new and material evidence that, notwithstanding the exercise of reasonable diligence by the defendants, was not discovered before or during trial, which evidence, if available, allegedly would probably have changed the verdict of guilty. After argument and consideration, we have decided to remand the matter for a hearing on the motion for a new trial by the trial court.

It is ordered by this Court that the matter herein be remanded to the trial court to hear defendants' motion for a new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Bradford

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Apr 4, 1973
275 So. 2d 407 (La. 1973)
Case details for

State v. Bradford

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. LUTHER JAMES BRADFORD AND ROBERT HAYWARD BLUMBERG

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Apr 4, 1973

Citations

275 So. 2d 407 (La. 1973)

Citing Cases

State v. Spell

Therefore, in accordance with the above provisions, we remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on…

State v. Shannon

In accordance with the above provision, we remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on defendant's…