From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Boyum

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 5, 1972
197 N.W.2d 218 (Minn. 1972)

Opinion

No. 42922.

May 5, 1972.

Criminal law — conviction of illegal distribution of drug — sufficiency of evidence.

Appeal by Kim Boyum from a judgment of the Winona County District Court, Glenn E. Kelley, Judge, whereby he was convicted of illegal distribution of drugs, and from an order denying his alternative motion for judgment of acquittal or for a new trial. Affirmed.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, and Jerome D. Truhn, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellant.

Warren Spannaus, Attorney General, John M. Mason, Solicitor General, and Eldon G. Kaul, Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Heard before Knutson, C. J., and Rogosheske, Todd, and Gunn, JJ.


A jury found defendant guilty of illegal distribution of stimulant or depressant drugs in violation of Minn. St. 1969, § 152.09. An examination of the evidence discloses that there is ample evidence to sustain the jury's verdict and that no prejudicial error was committed by the trial court. Although defendant contradicted some of the evidence, the weight and credibility of disputed evidence are for the jury. State v. Darrow, 287 Minn. 230, 177 N.W.2d 778 (1970).

Affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE MacLAUGHLIN, not having been a member of this court at the time of the argument and submission, took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

State v. Boyum

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 5, 1972
197 N.W.2d 218 (Minn. 1972)
Case details for

State v. Boyum

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. KIM BOYUM

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: May 5, 1972

Citations

197 N.W.2d 218 (Minn. 1972)
197 N.W.2d 218

Citing Cases

State v. Washington

The weight and credibility to be given disputed evidence are determinations to be made by the jury. State v.…

State v. Vail

We have not prescribed minimum evidentiary requirements in identification cases, preferring to examine the…