From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Boynton

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 22, 1983
331 N.W.2d 926 (Minn. 1983)

Opinion

No. C7-82-1053.

April 22, 1983.

Appeal from District Court, Olmsted County; O. Russell Olson, Judge.

Hubert H. Humphrey III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, DeWayne P. Mattson, County Atty., and Raymond F. Schmitz, Asst. County Atty., Rochester, for appellant.

Dunlap, Keith, Finseth, Berndt Sandberg and A.M. Keith, Rochester, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


This is an appeal by the state, pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 244.11 (1982), from a sentencing departure by the district court in the form of a stay of imposition of sentence in a case in which the Sentencing Guidelines recommend imposition and execution of sentence. This case is a companion case to State v. Hennessy, 328 N.W.2d 442 (Minn. 1983), where, on similar facts, we upheld a dispositional departure by the same judge with respect to defendant's accomplice. That case controls, and we affirm.

Affirmed.

KELLEY, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.


Summaries of

State v. Boynton

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Apr 22, 1983
331 N.W.2d 926 (Minn. 1983)
Case details for

State v. Boynton

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Scott Bradley BOYNTON, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Apr 22, 1983

Citations

331 N.W.2d 926 (Minn. 1983)