State v. Boyd

Full title: STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD THOMAS BOYD…

Court: Court of Appeals of Ohio, Seventh District, Belmont

Date published: Jun 30, 2023

2023 Ohio 2369 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023)

Opinion

21 BE 0048

06-30-2023

STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DONALD THOMAS BOYD, Defendant-Appellant.

Atty. J. Kevin Flanagan, Belmont County Prosecutor and Atty. Jacob A. Manning, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Plaintiff-Appellee Atty. Brian A. Smith, Brian A. Smith Law Firm, LLC, for Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM

Appellant's Limited Motion for Reconsideration

Atty. J. Kevin Flanagan, Belmont County Prosecutor and Atty. Jacob A. Manning, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for Plaintiff-Appellee

Atty. Brian A. Smith, Brian A. Smith Law Firm, LLC, for Defendant-Appellant.

BEFORE: Cheryl L. Waite, Carol Ann Robb, Mark A. Hanni, Judges.

OPINION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY

PER CURIAM

{¶1} Appellant Donald Thomas Boyd filed a limited motion for reconsideration of our Opinion in State v. Boyd, 7th Dist. Belmont No. 21 BE 0048, 2023-Ohio-1120. Appellant challenges the remedy for the trial court's failure to properly impose a sentence consistent with the Reagan Tokes Act. However, the trial court has already corrected the error by ordering a limited resentencing hearing. Thus, this matter is moot.

CHERYL L. WAITE, CAROL ANN ROBB, MARK A. HANNI JUDGE