From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bowles

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 29, 1995
533 N.W.2d 617 (Minn. 1995)

Opinion

C0-93-2105.

June 29, 1995.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Atty., Mark V. Griffin, Asst. County Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Evan W. Jones, Asst. Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

WHEREAS, by opinion filed April 21, 1995, the above-entitled matter was remanded to the trial court for supplementation of the record, State v. Bowles, 530 N.W.2d 521 (Minn. 1995); and

WHEREAS, this court is satisfied that the verdict returned by the jury was the "true and correct" verdict of all of the jurors, including juror # 4,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellant's motion for additional briefing and oral argument be, and the same is, denied.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice


Summaries of

State v. Bowles

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jun 29, 1995
533 N.W.2d 617 (Minn. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Bowles

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Shannon Noah BOWLES, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jun 29, 1995

Citations

533 N.W.2d 617 (Minn. 1995)

Citing Cases

Kambon v. State

Upon further review after remand, we determined that the verdict was the jury's true and correct verdict and…