From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Boston

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 25, 2018
556 S.W.3d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 81091

09-25-2018

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Corey D. BOSTON, Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent. Casey A. Taylor, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.


Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Robert J. (Jeff) Bartholomew, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Casey A. Taylor, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbia, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division Four: Karen King Mitchell, Chief Judge, and Mark D. Pfeiffer and Cynthia L. Martin, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Corey Boston appeals, following a jury trial, his conviction of first-degree tampering with a motor vehicle under § 569.080.1(2), RSMo 2016, for which he received a three-year sentence, the execution of which was suspended. On appeal, Boston argues that the evidence was insufficient to prove that he operated the vehicle at issue "without the consent of the owner thereof" insofar as there was no evidence that the vehicle’s title-holder did not provide consent. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Boston

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Sep 25, 2018
556 S.W.3d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

State v. Boston

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Corey D. BOSTON, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Sep 25, 2018

Citations

556 S.W.3d 675 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)