From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Boozer

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Mar 30, 2016
Appellate Case No. 2014-002536 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 30, 2016)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-002536 Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-154

03-30-2016

The State, Respondent, v. Rashondre Montese Boozer, Appellant.

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Spartanburg County
Gordon G. Cooper, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Boozer

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Mar 30, 2016
Appellate Case No. 2014-002536 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 30, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Boozer

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Rashondre Montese Boozer, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 30, 2016

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2014-002536 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 30, 2016)