From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bond

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 29, 1998
722 A.2d 808 (Conn. 1998)

Opinion

Glenn W. Falk, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Linda N. Howe, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

Decided September 29, 1998


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 49 Conn. App. 183 (AC 16306), is denied.


I would grant the defendant's petition for certification to appeal on the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court's comment about the existence of a criminal conspiracy, made during its jury instruction on accomplice testimony, only implicated general principles of credibility and, therefore, did not merit review under State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 567 A.2d 823 (1989)?

"2. If review is warranted, did the trial court's comment deprive the defendant of a fair trial?"


Summaries of

State v. Bond

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 29, 1998
722 A.2d 808 (Conn. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Bond

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DANTE BOND

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 29, 1998

Citations

722 A.2d 808 (Conn. 1998)
247 Conn. 915

Citing Cases

Bond v. Commissioner of Correction

On September 29, 1998, the Connecticut Supreme Court denied petitioner's petition for certification to appeal…