State v. Boman

Full title: STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BONNIE VALINDA BOMAN…

Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: Feb 14, 2014

Docket No. 41318 (Idaho Ct. App. Feb. 14, 2014)

Opinion

Docket No. 41318 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 376

02-14-2014

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BONNIE VALINDA BOMAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly E. Smith, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

PER CURIAM

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Lynn G. Norton, District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of fourteen years with a minimum period of confinement of five years for grand theft by possession of stolen property, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly E. Smith, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Bonnie Valinda Boman was convicted of grand theft by possession of stolen property, Idaho Code §§ 18-2403(4), 18-2407(1), 18-2409. The district court sentenced Boman to a unified term of fourteen years with a minimum period of confinement of five years. Boman appeals, contending that her sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Boman's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.