From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bogdanyi

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Nov 2, 1977
378 A.2d 1325 (Me. 1977)

Opinion

November 2, 1977.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Oxford County.

Thomas E. Delahanty, II, Dist. Atty., Herbert Bunker, Jr., Deputy Dist. Atty., Auburn, for plaintiff.

Aldrich Turner by Craig E. Turner, South Paris, for defendant.

Before DUFRESNE, C.J., and POMEROY, WERNICK, ARCHIBALD and GODFREY, JJ.


Defendant was indicted for breaking, entering and larceny ( 17 M.R.S.A. § 2103), tried before a jury, convicted and has appealed.

We deny the appeal.

The two points reserved on appeal have been, on the facts in this record, precedentially decided adversely to the appellant.

I

State v. Curtis, 295 A.2d 252 (Me. 1972), is determinative of appellant's argument that it was error to refuse the motion for continuance because of the unavailability of a witness.

Appellant also argues that the State's failure to disclose certain facts pursuant to an order issued under Rule 16(a), M.R.Crim.P., is a further basis for continuance. The record demonstrates, however, that there was a substantial compliance with the disclosure order.

II

There was no error in denying appellant's motion for judgment of acquittal. Since there was ample and sufficient evidence of a burglarious entry into the alleged building and since the defendant was found, shortly thereafter, in possession of goods proved to have been stolen from this structure and there was no evidence to justify this possession, our decision in State v. Reed, 347 A.2d 123 (Me. 1975), is controlling.

The entry is:

Appeal denied.

DELAHANTY, J., did not sit.

DUFRESNE, A.R.J., sat at oral argument as Chief Justice but retired prior to the preparation of the opinion. He has joined the opinion as Active Retired Justice.

All Justices concurring.


Summaries of

State v. Bogdanyi

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Nov 2, 1977
378 A.2d 1325 (Me. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Bogdanyi

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Maine v. Daniel BOGDANYI

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Date published: Nov 2, 1977

Citations

378 A.2d 1325 (Me. 1977)

Citing Cases

State v. King

It has long been the rule in Maine that recent and exclusive possession of stolen goods may give rise to an…

State v. Atkinson

Thus, the jury was warranted in drawing the inference that not only had the defendants committed the larceny…