From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bogan

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Nov 30, 2017
Docket No. 44771 (Idaho Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2017)

Opinion

Docket No. 44771 2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 657

11-30-2017

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CRAIG BOGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bannock County. Hon. Robert C. Naftz, District Judge. Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of eight years, with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for aggravated battery, affirmed. Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge; and HUSKEY, Judge

____________________

PER CURIAM

Craig Bogan pleaded guilty to aggravated battery, Idaho Code §§ 18-903, 18-907(1)(a). The district court imposed a unified eight-year sentence, with three years determinate. Bogan appeals, contending that his sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Bogan's judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Bogan

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO
Nov 30, 2017
Docket No. 44771 (Idaho Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Bogan

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. CRAIG BOGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Date published: Nov 30, 2017

Citations

Docket No. 44771 (Idaho Ct. App. Nov. 30, 2017)