State v. Blanding

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Kevin Blanding, Appellant.

Court: THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 21, 2011

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-592 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-592

12-21-2011

The State, Respondent, v. Kevin Blanding, Appellant.

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Lexington County

Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM : Kevin Blanding appeals his conviction for trafficking in heroin, arguing the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a directed verdict. Additionally, Blanding asserts numerous pro se arguments. After a thorough review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss¹ the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., THOMAS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.