His self-serving, speculative assertions are not enough to show actual prejudice. See State v. Blanck , 2001 WI App 288, ¶ 23, 249 Wis. 2d 364, 638 N.W.2d 910. Therefore, the circuit court did not err by permitting the amendment to the Information.
A defendant has a due process right to be free from excessive precharging delay which substantially prejudices his or her right to a fair trial. State v. Blanck, 2001 WI App 288, ¶ 21, 249 Wis. 2d 364, 638 N.W.2d 910. "To establish a due process violation, a defendant must prove that actual prejudice has been suffered as a result of the delay, and must show that the government caused the delay for an improper purpose." Id., ¶ 22.
Under the Due Process Clause, the defendant must demonstrate that he or she suffered actual prejudice as a result of the delay and must show that the government caused the delay for an improper purpose. State v. Blanck, 2001 WI App 288, ¶ 22, 249 Wis. 2d 364, 638 N.W.2d 910. ¶ 18.
We decline to review issues inadequately briefed." State v. Blanck, 2001 WI 288, ¶ 27, 249 Wis.2d 364, 638 N.W.2d 910. Also, "this court does not consider arguments broadly stated but not specifically argued." Id.