From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Blake

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 14, 2018
2018-UP-113 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2018)

Opinion

2018-UP-113

03-14-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Mark Lorenzo Blake, Jr., Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2016-001715

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Mark Lorenzo Blake, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted February 1, 2018

Appeal From Charleston County Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Mark Lorenzo Blake, Jr., pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Blake

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 14, 2018
2018-UP-113 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2018)
Case details for

State v. Blake

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Mark Lorenzo Blake, Jr., Appellant. Appellate…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 14, 2018

Citations

2018-UP-113 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2018)