State v. Blake

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Mark Lorenzo Blake, Jr., Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 14, 2018

Appellate Case No. 2016-001715 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 14, 2018)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2016-001715 Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-113

03-14-2018

The State, Respondent, v. Mark Lorenzo Blake, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Mark Lorenzo Blake, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Charleston County
Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Mark Lorenzo Blake, Jr., pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED. ¹ HUFF, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------