From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Blair

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 2, 2016
2016-UP-105 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2016)

Opinion

2016-UP-105

03-02-2016

The State, Appellant, v. Nicholas M. Blair, Respondent. Appellate Case No. 2014-001003

Marcus Keith Gore and Catherine Fant, both of the South Carolina Department of Public Safety, of Blythewood, for Appellant. Gregory A. DeLuca, of DeLuca & Maucher, L.L.P., of Moncks Corner, for Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted November 1, 2015

Appeal From Berkeley County Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge.

Marcus Keith Gore and Catherine Fant, both of the South Carolina Department of Public Safety, of Blythewood, for Appellant.

Gregory A. DeLuca, of DeLuca & Maucher, L.L.P., of Moncks Corner, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Rule 220(c), SCACR ("The appellate court may affirm any ruling, order, decision or judgment upon any ground(s) appearing in the Record on Appeal."); State v. Sheppard, 391 S.C. 415, 423, 706 S.E.2d 16, 20 (2011) ("[A]n issue may not be raised for the first time on appeal."); State v. Adams, 354 S.C. 361, 380, 580 S.E.2d 785, 795 (Ct. App. 2003) ("Arguments not raised to or ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review."); State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 694 (2003) ("A party may not argue one ground at trial and an alternate ground on appeal."); State v. Cope, 405 S.C. 317, 339, 748 S.E.2d 194, 205 (2013) ("Prohibiting an appellant from raising an issue for the first time on appeal ensures that the trial court is able 'to rule properly after it has considered all relevant facts, law, and arguments.'" (quoting Herron v. Century BMW, 395 S.C. 461, 465, 719 S.E.2d 640, 642 (2012))); State v. Gault, 375 S.C. 570, 573, 654 S.E.2d 98, 99-100 (Ct. App. 2007) (finding an appellant's argument that had been raised on appeal to the circuit court unpreserved because the appellant had not raised that argument at trial to the magistrate court).

AFFIRMED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, A.C.J., and WILLIAMS and THOMAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Blair

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Mar 2, 2016
2016-UP-105 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2016)
Case details for

State v. Blair

Case Details

Full title:The State, Appellant, v. Nicholas M. Blair, Respondent. Appellate Case No…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Mar 2, 2016

Citations

2016-UP-105 (S.C. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2016)