From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Blagen

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Nov 21, 2013
841 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 2013)

Opinion

No. 20130203.

2013-11-21

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Kyler Joseph BLAGEN, Defendant and Appellant.


[¶ 1] Kyler Blagen appeals from a criminal judgment entered after the district court denied his motion to suppress evidence and he entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of drug paraphernalia. Blagen argues the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress because law enforcement did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7). See State v. Miller, 510 N.W.2d 638, 640–42 (N.D.1994) (discussing tips from known and anonymous persons); City of Dickinson v. Hewson, 2011 ND 187, 803 N.W.2d 814 (officer had reasonable suspicion to justify stop of vehicle based on information reported to police by driver's husband).

[¶ 2] GERALD W. VANDE WALLE, C.J., DANIEL J. CROTHERS, MARY MUEHLEN MARING, CAROL RONNING KAPSNER, and DALE V. SANDSTROM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Blagen

Supreme Court of North Dakota.
Nov 21, 2013
841 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Blagen

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Kyler Joseph BLAGEN…

Court:Supreme Court of North Dakota.

Date published: Nov 21, 2013

Citations

841 N.W.2d 1 (N.D. 2013)
2013 N.D. 213