From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bispham

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 28, 1998
711 A.2d 728 (Conn. 1998)

Opinion

Decided April 28, 1998


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 48 Conn. App. 135 (AC 15820), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting a written statement of the complainant as constancy of accusation evidence, and that the defendant did not show prejudice from the admission of such evidence, despite the prosecutor's closing argument that the written statement would be available for review in the jury room to support the complainant's credibility?"

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15925.

Glenn W. Falk, in support of the petition.

Lisa Herskowitz, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Bispham

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Apr 28, 1998
711 A.2d 728 (Conn. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Bispham

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. DAVID BISPHAM

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Apr 28, 1998

Citations

711 A.2d 728 (Conn. 1998)
711 A.2d 728

Citing Cases

State v. Bispham

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the Appellate Court;…