From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bischoff

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 8, 2019
331 Conn. 926 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

05-08-2019

STATE of Connecticut v. Haji Jhmalah BISCHOFF

James B. Streeto, senior assistant public defender, and Emily H. Wagner, assistant public defender, in support of the petition. Jennifer F. Miller, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


James B. Streeto, senior assistant public defender, and Emily H. Wagner, assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

Jennifer F. Miller, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 189 Conn. App. 119, 206 A.3d 253 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine, in State v. Moore, 180 Conn. App. 116, 182 A.3d 696, cert. denied, 329 Conn. 905, 185 A.3d 595 (2018), that Public Acts 2015, No. 15-2, § 1 (P.A. 15-2), does not have retroactive effect?

"2. If the answer to the first certified question is ‘no,’ should this court overrule the retroactivity analysis contained in State v. Kalil, 314 Conn. 529, 552, 107 A.3d 343 (2014), and apply the amelioration doctrine to give retroactive effect to P.A. 15-2, § 1?"


Summaries of

State v. Bischoff

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 8, 2019
331 Conn. 926 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Bischoff

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Haji Jhmalah BISCHOFF

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: May 8, 2019

Citations

331 Conn. 926 (Conn. 2019)
207 A.3d 28

Citing Cases

State v. Bischoff

" And (2) "[i]f the answer to the first certified question is ‘[yes],’ should this court overrule the…

State v. Vasquez

(Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Bischoff , 189 Conn. App. 119, 123, 206 A.3d 253, cert. granted,…