From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Birdwell

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Mar 10, 1972
195 N.W.2d 502 (Neb. 1972)

Summary

In State v. Birdwell (1972), 188 Neb. 116, 195 N.W.2d 502, we stated: "The presentence reports could be relevant only to the sentences imposed upon the defendants. Sentences imposed within statutory limits furnish no basis for post conviction relief."

Summary of this case from State v. Leadinghorse

Opinion

Nos. 38087, 38088.

Filed March 10, 1972.

1. Officers. The authority of a de facto officer cannot be challenged by collateral attack. 2. Criminal Law: Guilty Plea. A valid plea of guilty in the district court cures any defect that may have occurred in the proceedings before the examining magistrate. 3. Criminal Law: Sentences: Post Conviction. Matters relating to sentences imposed within statutory limits are not a basis for post conviction relief.

Appeals from the district court for Dawes County: ROBERT R. MORAN, Judge. Affirmed.

James Lee Birdwell and Walter Allen Green, pro se.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Melvin K. Kammerlohr, for appellee.

Heard before WHITE, C. J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN, NEWTON, and CLINTON, JJ.


The defendants were convicted of burglary upon pleas of guilty. The convictions were affirmed in State v. Green, 185 Neb. 673, 178 N.W.2d 271, and State v. Birdwell, 185 Neb. 676, 178 N.W.2d 270. Thereafter the defendants filed separate motions for post conviction relief which were denied on March 22, 1971, without an evidentiary hearing. Since the motions present identical grounds for relief, we consider the appeals together.

The defendants alleged their convictions are void because they were bound over to the district court by an acting county judge whose appointment had expired; their waivers of counsel before the acting county judge were invalid; and the trial court failed to allow them to examine the presentence report

The acting county judge was at least a de facto officer and his authority cannot be challenged by a collateral attack. See State ex rel. Weiner v. Hans, 174 Neb. 612, 119 N.W.2d 72.

The defendants' waivers of counsel and pleas of guilty in the district court were considered in the prior appeals and held valid. State v. Green, supra; and State v. Birdwell, supra. The pleas of guilty cured any defects that might have occurred in the proceedings in the county court.

The presentence reports could be relevant only to the sentences imposed upon the defendants. Sentences imposed within statutory limits furnish no basis for post conviction relief. State v. Bullard, 187 Neb. 334, 190 N.W.2d 628.

The files and records show conclusively that the defendants were not entitled to post conviction relief. The trial court was not required to grant evidentiary hearings or appoint counsel for the defendants in these proceedings.

Subsequent motions filed April 5, 1971, and denied April 16, 1971, are not before us. However, they are subject to the rule announced in State v. Reichel, 187 Neb. 464, 191 N.W.2d 826.

The judgments are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Birdwell

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Mar 10, 1972
195 N.W.2d 502 (Neb. 1972)

In State v. Birdwell (1972), 188 Neb. 116, 195 N.W.2d 502, we stated: "The presentence reports could be relevant only to the sentences imposed upon the defendants. Sentences imposed within statutory limits furnish no basis for post conviction relief."

Summary of this case from State v. Leadinghorse
Case details for

State v. Birdwell

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. JAMES LEE BIRDWELL, APPELLANT. STATE OF…

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Mar 10, 1972

Citations

195 N.W.2d 502 (Neb. 1972)
195 N.W.2d 502

Citing Cases

State v. Shepard

See State v. Shepard, case No. 42274. This court has consistently held that matters relating to sentences…

State v. Wade

The defendant now seeks post conviction relief on the ground the sentence is in violation of section 83-1,105…