In Bernheim v. State, 28 So. 28, it was held that the discretion given by the statute to the trial court in the matter of taxation of costs will not be interfered with. See, also, Bernheim Bros. Uri v. Brogan, 66 Miss. 184 at 187; Wilson v. Brown, 94 Miss. 608; Fleming v. State, 60 Miss. 434.
Summary of this case from Yalobusha County v. DavisDecember 10, 1984.
Petition for certification denied.
In Bernheim v. State, 28 So. 28, it was held that the discretion given by the statute to the trial court in the matter of taxation of costs will not be interfered with. See, also, Bernheim Bros. Uri v. Brogan, 66 Miss. 184 at 187; Wilson v. Brown, 94 Miss. 608; Fleming v. State, 60 Miss. 434.
Summary of this case from Yalobusha County v. DavisFull title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. L. ANDREW BERNHEIM
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: Dec 10, 1984
This provision, that all bills for raising revenue shall originate in the House, was borrowed from the…
Yalobusha County v. DavisTherefore this court is utterly in the dark as to the "circumstances of the case." In Bernheim v. State, 28…