Opinion
73034-7-I
01-19-2016
STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. DANIEL ALBERT BELLEQUE, Appellant.
UNPUBLISHED OPINION
Per Curiam
Daniel Belleque appeals his convictions for burglary in the second degree and theft in the third degree. Belleque contends, and the State concedes, that he was denied his constitutional right to self-representation. See State v. Madsen, 168 Wn.2d 496, 229 P.3d 714 (2010). We accept the State's concession, reverse Belleque's convictions, and remand the matter for a new trial.
In his statement of additional grounds for review, Belleque contends that the trial court violated his CrR 3.3 speedy trial rights. But his conclusory allegations provide no basis for appellate review. See RAP 10.10(c). Because we reverse Belleque's convictions and remand for a new trial, the remaining allegations in his statement of additional grounds are moot.
Reversed and remanded.