From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Beattie

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 10, 1993
629 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1993)

Summary

In State v. Beattie, 629 So.2d 112 (Fla. 1993), the supreme court quashed this court's opinion and remanded this case for reconsideration in light of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993).

Summary of this case from Beattie v. State

Opinion

No. 79528.

November 10, 1993.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal, Direct Conflict of Decisions, Second District, Case No. 91-00300 (Collier County).

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and David R. Gemmer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.

Lawrence D. Martin of Vega, Brown, Stanley, Martin Zelman, P.A., Naples, for respondent.


The petition for review of Beattie v. State, 595 So.2d 249 (Fla.2d DCA 1992), is granted, but the filing of briefs on the merits and oral argument are dispensed with. We quash Beattie and remand for reconsideration in light of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993).

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Beattie

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 10, 1993
629 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1993)

In State v. Beattie, 629 So.2d 112 (Fla. 1993), the supreme court quashed this court's opinion and remanded this case for reconsideration in light of Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90 (Fla. 1993).

Summary of this case from Beattie v. State
Case details for

State v. Beattie

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. ALEXANDER BEATTIE, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 10, 1993

Citations

629 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1993)

Citing Cases

Beattie v. State

PARKER, Judge. In State v. Beattie, 629 So.2d 112 (Fla. 1993), the supreme court quashed this court's opinion…