From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bean

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jul 23, 1996
925 S.W.2d 511 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Nos. 65815, 68853.

July 23, 1996.

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY; DANIEL J. O'TOOLE, JR., JUDGE.

Gary E. Brotherton, Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John W. Simon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., and KAROHL and GRIMM, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of second degree burglary, § 569.170, RSMo 1986, and stealing $150 or more, § 570.030, RSMo 1986. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Bean

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jul 23, 1996
925 S.W.2d 511 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

State v. Bean

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF/RESPONDENT, v. WARDELL BEAN…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jul 23, 1996

Citations

925 S.W.2d 511 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)