From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Beal

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 28, 1995
895 S.W.2d 635 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

Nos. 64068, 66483.

March 28, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS; DANIEL T. TILLMAN, JUDGE.

John Klosterman, Robert Steele, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Mary Moulton, Fernando Bermudez, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANE, P.J., CRANDALL and DOWD, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant Vernon Beal appeals after a jury convicted him of attempting to steal a motor vehicle. Defendant also filed a notice of appeal from the motion court's denial of post-conviction relief but abandoned his appeal by not briefing any points of error relating to the motion court's order. We affirm.

We find no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion and affirm by written summary order. Rule 30.25(b). A memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision has been issued to the parties for their use only.


Summaries of

State v. Beal

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Mar 28, 1995
895 S.W.2d 635 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Beal

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. VERNON BEAL, APPELLANT. VERNON BEAL…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Mar 28, 1995

Citations

895 S.W.2d 635 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Stokes v. National Presto Industries, Inc.

As to whether the trial court erred in granting additur and necessarily a new trial in favor of Stokes, we…