Opinion
Argued October 17, 1944 —
Decided January 4, 1945.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 132 N.J.L. 74.
For the defendant in error, William A. Wachenfeld.
For the plaintiff in error, Isidor Kalisch and Oliver Randolph.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Brogan in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, PORTER, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 10.
For reversal — COLIE, J. 1.