From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Barry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2008
48 A.D.3d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2006-10938.

February 26, 2008.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Westchester County (R. Bellantoni, J.), dated November 3, 2006, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Lois Cullen Valerio and Anthony J. Servino of counsel; Alan Williams on the brief), for respondent.

Before: Spolzino, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Carni, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant was appropriately assessed points based on the victim's physical helplessness ( see People v Davenport, 38 AD3d 634), and for having inflicted a physical injury on her ( see People v Bogan, 70 NY2d 860; People v Cannon, 300 AD2d 407). The County Court's determination to designate the defendant a level three sex offender was supported by clear and convincing evidence ( see People v Smith, 46 AD3d 791; People v Morris, 33 AD3d 778).

The issue of whether an automatic override is applicable in this case has been rendered academic given the determination that the defendant is, by score, a level three sex offender.


Summaries of

State v. Barry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 26, 2008
48 A.D.3d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

State v. Barry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BARRY WILKES, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 26, 2008

Citations

48 A.D.3d 777 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 1732
851 N.Y.S.2d 359

Citing Cases

People v. Greenridge

In addition, under the theory of accessorial liability, clear and convincing evidence demonstrates that the…