Opinion
1 CA-CR 20-0510 PRPC
06-15-2021
STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. JACK O'NEAL BARRETT, Petitioner.
Yuma County Attorney's Office, Yuma By Charles Platt Counsel for Respondent Jack O'Neal Barrett, Buckeye Petitioner
Not for Publication - Rule 111(c), Rules of the Arizona Supreme Court
Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Yuma County No. S1400 CR198916130 The Honorable Brandon S. Kinsey, Judge
Yuma County Attorney's Office, Yuma By Charles Platt Counsel for Respondent
Jack O'Neal Barrett, Buckeye Petitioner
Presiding Judge D. Steven Williams, Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, and Judge James B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court.
MEMORANDUM DECISION
PER CURIUM
¶1 Petitioner Jack O'Neal Barrett seeks review of the superior court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is petitioner's latest successive petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, the petition for review, and the response thereto. The petitioner has failed to show an abuse of discretion.
¶4 For the foregoing reasons, this court grants review but denies relief.