State v. Barner

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Dye

    2021 Ohio 3513 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021)   Cited 3 times

    For an arrest, the officer must have probable cause. State v. Barner, 6th Dist. Wood No. WD-01-034, 2002 WL 737065 (Apr. 26, 2002). For an investigatory stop, the officer must have a reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity is occurring.

  2. State v. Smaltz

    2009 Ohio 517 (Ohio Ct. App. 2009)

    " State v. Shepard (1997), 122 Ohio App.3d 358, 364.' State v. Barner (Apr. 26, 2002), 6th Dist. No. WD-01-034." State v. Beeley, ¶ 15.

  3. State v. Beeley

    2006 Ohio 4799 (Ohio Ct. App. 2006)   Cited 1 times

    State v. Sanders (1998), 130 Ohio App.3d 789, 794. Reasonable suspicion is `* * * something more than an inchoate or unparticularized suspicion or hunch, but less than the level of suspicion required for probable cause.' State v. Shepard (1997), 122 Ohio App.3d 358, 364." State v. Barner (Apr. 26, 2002), 6th Dist. No. WD-01-034. {¶ 16}Turner specifically held that, "after smelling the odor of alcohol on a driver," an officer does not act unreasonably or intrusively by conducting field sobriety tests.