From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Barge

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 6, 2012
174 Wn. 2d 1006 (Wash. 2012)

Opinion

No. 87230–9.

2012-06-6

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. William Aaron BARGE, Petitioner.


ORDER

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Chambers, Fairhurst, Stephens and González, considered at its June 5, 2012, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petitioner's “Motion to Immediately Grant Review and Grant Requested Relief” is denied. The Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of State v. Caton, 174 Wash.2d 239, 273 P.3d 980 (2012).

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J.

CHIEF JUSTICE


Summaries of

State v. Barge

Supreme Court of Washington.
Jun 6, 2012
174 Wn. 2d 1006 (Wash. 2012)
Case details for

State v. Barge

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. William Aaron BARGE, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of Washington.

Date published: Jun 6, 2012

Citations

174 Wn. 2d 1006 (Wash. 2012)
174 Wash. 2d 1006
278 P.3d 184