In Barfield, Dr. Brown tested the DNA from a semen sample retrieved from a rape victim and compared the results to a WSPCL database that included defendant Barfield's DNA.
Summary of this case from Woods v. SinclairNo. 48147-9-I.
September 15, 2003.
Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-1-02618-5, Ann Schindler, J., entered January 12 and 23, 2001.
Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Coleman, J., concurred in by Cox, A.C.J., and Ellington, J.
In Barfield, Dr. Brown tested the DNA from a semen sample retrieved from a rape victim and compared the results to a WSPCL database that included defendant Barfield's DNA.
Summary of this case from Woods v. SinclairIn Barfield, Dr. Brown tested the DNA from a semen sample retrieved from a rape victim and compared the results to a WSPCL database that included defendant Barfield's DNA.
Summary of this case from Woods v. SinclairFull title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. CRAIG M. BARFIELD, Appellant
Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Date published: Sep 15, 2003
IX. DUE PROCESS CLAIM—WITHHOLDING MATERIAL EVIDENCE Woods argues that the prosecution withheld material,…
Woods v. SinclairWoods argues that the prosecution withheld material, exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland.…