State v. Barajas

Full title: STATE OF OREGON, Petitioner on Review, v. LUCILO ROMERO BARAJAS…

Court: Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Aug 15, 1996

920 P.2d 1097 (Or. 1996)

920 P.2d 1097

Opinion

CC 920534889; CA A75949; SC S41439

Argued and submitted January 12, 1995, Decision of the Court of Appeals vacated,

Case remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration August 15, 1996 See 145 Or. App. 600, 930 P.2d 1180 (1997)

On review from the Court of Appeals.^_

_ Appeal from Union County Circuit Court, Ronald D. Schenck, Judge. 127 Or. App. 749, 873 P.2d 344 (1994).

Michael C. Livingston, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Timothy A. Sylwester, Assistant Attorney General.

Peter Gartlan, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the brief was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender.

Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Fadeley, Graber, and Durham, Justices.^__

__ Van Hoomissen, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case; Unis, J., retired June 30, 1996, and did not participate in this decision.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of State v. Cookman, 324 Or. 19, 920 P.2d 1086 (1996).

Gillette, J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

GILLETTE, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part.

I concur in part and dissent in part for the reasons expressed in my concurring and dissenting opinion in State v. Cookman, 324 Or. 19, 920 P.2d 1086 (1996).