Opinion
Appellate Case No. 2013-001036 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-479
12-23-2014
The State, Respondent, v. Kashaun Banks, Appellant.
Blakely Lynn Molitor, of Collins & Lacy, PC, and Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, both of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior Assistant Attorney General David A. Spencer, and Assistant Attorney General Kristin M. Simons, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Appeal From Charleston County
Kristi Lea Harrington, Circuit Court Judge
AFFIRMED
Blakely Lynn Molitor, of Collins & Lacy, PC, and Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, both of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Senior Assistant Attorney General David A. Spencer, and Assistant Attorney General Kristin M. Simons, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Kashaun Banks appeals his conviction for armed robbery, arguing the trial court erred in finding his confession was admissible evidence. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Moses, 390 S.C. 502, 511, 702 S.E.2d 395, 400 (Ct. App. 2010) ("[M]aking a motion in limine to exclude evidence at the beginning of trial does not preserve an issue for review because a motion in limine is not a final determination. The moving party, therefore, must make a contemporaneous objection when the evidence is introduced." (alteration in original) (quoting State v. Forrester, 343 S.C. 637, 642, 541 S.E.2d 837, 840 (2001)) (internal quotation marks omitted)); State v. Smith, 337 S.C 27, 32, 522 S.E.2d 598, 600 (1999) (holding unless an objection is made at the time the evidence is offered and a final ruling made, the issue is not preserved for review).