Summary
In Ballesteros, we concluded that the defendant failed to establish that the District Court had improperly considered the defendant's prior offenses as impermissible propensity evidence that he drove while impaired.
Summary of this case from State v. NahaleaOpinion
NO. CAAP-20-0000472
06-28-2021
STATE of Hawai‘i, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ruel S. BALLESTEROS, Defendant-Appellant
On the briefs: Brian S. Kim (Park & Kim, LLLC) for Defendant-Appellant Donn Fudo Deputy Prosecuting Attorney for Plaintiff-Appellee
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER
Affirmed.